Saturday, October 2, 2010

Conception

So here's a piece of the story... Like the blog title explains it will be hosted/told by EarthreceptoR, that's me. My otherness. As far as I can remember EarthreceptoR was born or recognized sometime around 1993-1994. The entity was born from an idea that, at the time, seemed so amazing so profound that I had to go with it. I had to run around and share this idea with my surrounding masses of soggy energy. The most amazing idea a human brain has EVER conceived! The piece of the puzzle that would tie all theories to themselves. The shit that was going to save us all... Or, at least propel us into the future. Maybe...Or not.
M=3(multiplied by a segment) + (the symbol for infinity), now of course 16 years later this seems a bit loopy to be any form of Nobel material but at the time it was certainly on the right track. The idea or equation explained that as humans we ALL shared a common connection. It was my own equation for the design of the human body that showed us all being a mass or "M" with three segments connected to and enabled with the option of infinity. Two of the segments are connected to the earth-mass (gigantic electromagnetic generator) and the other extends upward to receive any "incoming" signals. The connection with infinity would be enabled or utilized by the arms and hands of the human body. A metaphor for phor anything is possible. I thought, with great strength, at times of the power science has held over the human race for centuries and concluded that as with religion we can pretty much explain anything as long as we're good at convincing the masses that what we are saying is possible. So with that in mind I felt my little equation was lookin' pretty good.

A mass (human body) which receives power from the source (earth=giant electromagnet) by using two segments (legs/or connection to the source) and moderates navigational information by using a third (torso/head/brain) all while having the power to choose to do whatever is necessary OR desired by any means possible in accordance with the host body's own capabilities. That was the big idea. Of course when broken down to it's core intention/s the idea seems a bit obvious or inherent as far as what we think of ourselves these days. I feel obliged to mention the fact of my heavy use of tetrahydrocannabinal and 4-hydroxyl-dimethyltryptamine at the time but that being said I still feel like the idea at that time in my life was pretty profound, rather the act of perpetuating the idea into an understandable form (for me) was pretty profound. Point being, as per the entire idea, all I knew at the time was the information given to me about the subject was coming from somewhere... Everything we're bombarded with on a daily basis comes from somewhere.

                                                                                            


                                                                           Pulse Code

3 comments:

  1. Sending a signal to return to the quark
    it responds with a messege in the form of a phorx
    now i gotta get an oracle quote
    meeting a shamen through the no-exit door.

    My DMT signal was a giant floating pink tribal head with a hum similar to hypno-toad.

    I would like to learn more about your equation.

    I have sum algorythms as well or rather algorythms are an important matephor.

    The poetic algorythm of fractal human language. And the combination of seemingly arbitray variable connections in order to harness chaos and surpass logic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Some may call it psudoscience, but what is science but a collection of ideas just as this? The difference being they have only been tested a multitude of times by it's own law. And those laws were only created by the very first to ever suggest that there may be more going on here than we see with just our eyes. The irony of that for me is that science demands empirical evidence. That is "we must be able to see and understand what you are talking about!" Well... How do we get others to see or understand what we are talking about? Through visual metaphors and complex explainations. My hypothesis is that "science" as we know it is no more or no less special than any other art form. It is comprised of communications that allow those willing to veiw their surrounding world in a different light. The scientist is an artist who, by the use of special tools, can show the rest of the world what is going on to the best of their abilities allowed by the structures given at that particular time in space...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree. Science is a type of poetry that describes a certain aspect of reality. To limit validation of reality to empirical evidence is non-sensical and boring.

    ReplyDelete